Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT IN CORPORATE COMPUTER TRESPASS CASE

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictment of PETER JAN, 35, in connection with his unauthorized access and duplication of computer files owned by AllianceBernstein Holding LP, a United States-based global investment firm.[1] JAN, a former employee of AllianceBernstein, is charged with Computer Trespass, Unlawful Duplication of Computer Related Materials, and Grand Larceny.

“The defendant, who was leaving his job and moving to a new firm, saw and took an opportunity to steal AllianceBernstein’s software and thereby violate New York State law,” said District Attorney Vance. “Employees who take advantage of their access to sensitive information will face criminal prosecution for data theft.”

According to documents filed in court and statements made on the record in court, JAN was a FIX Application Support Specialist employed by the sell-side brokerage unit of AllianceBernstein. His job responsibilities included providing computer support relating to a program that received and sent “FIX” or “Financial Information eXchange” messages, a messaging standard used to communicate securities transactions electronically. On March 8, 2010, JAN gave notice of his intent to quit his job at AllianceBernstein. His resignation was to be effective on March 19, 2010.

On four dates before JAN’s resignation, according to documents filed in court, JAN used an external hard drive to download specialized computer software licensed to AllianceBernstein without permission or authority to do so. The software was used by the company to send and receive FIX messages that contained data regarding the identities of AllianceBernstein clients and transactions conducted by clients, as well as computer data and files owned by AllianceBernstein. By taking the software, JAN was able to read the content of the FIX messages. On March 15, 2010, JAN was fired by AllianceBernstein.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant District Attorney Tracy Conn under the supervision of Assistant District Attorneys David Szuchman, Chief of the Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau, and Jeremy Glickman, Deputy Chief of the Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau. Investigator Robert Muldoon, Deputy Chief Investigator for Cybercrime Richard Brittson, Director of the High Tech Analysis Unit Steven Moran, and Senior Computer Forensic Analyst Selena Ley assisted in the investigation.

District Attorney Vance thanked AllianceBernstein for their assistance and cooperation in the investigation.
Defendant Information:

PETER JAN, D.O.B. 1/3/1976
Queens, NY

Charges:

Computer Trespass, a class E felony, four counts
Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, a class E felony, one count
Unlawful Duplication of Computer Related Materials, a class E felony, one count
A class E felony is punishable by 1 â…“ to 4 years in prison.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...