Skip to main content

FBI Washington Field Office Receives Pentagon Stone Commemorating Response on September 11

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, the Washington Field Office, together with the Joint Force Headquarters Military District of Washington, hosted a ceremony to commemorate the permanent placement of a piece of stone recovered from the Pentagon following September 11, 2001.

The limestone block, weighing 800-pounds, presented to the Washington Field Office was part of a large stone block that was recovered from the west façade of the Pentagon, where a group of terrorists crashed a plane into the building nearly ten years ago. The stone was removed from the Pentagon and taken to Fort McNair, where the Joint Force Headquarters for the Military District of Washington had the stone cut into pieces for the purpose of presenting them to agencies that assisted in the September 11 response and recovery efforts.

"The relationship we share with the Military District of Washington, Arlington County Fire, and other first responders was formed long before that fateful day," said James McJunkin, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI's Washington Field Office. "In the years since, these bonds have grown as one of the few positive legacies of September 11. The FBI is stronger now because of these partnerships. What emerged from that scene at the Pentagon ten years ago should instill in every American today a sense of confidence in the skill, courage and keen coordination within of our Nation's law enforcement and first responders."

"This stone serves as a reminder of the past and is a tribute to the injured and the 184 lives lost at the Pentagon nearly ten years ago," said Karl Horst, Major General, Joint Force Headquarters National Capital Region. "Today we remember how our partners at the Bureau reacted with extraordinary heroism when – without warning – they were called upon to perform their duty in the midst of an unimaginable act of terrorism. This stone is a symbol of the powerful bonds that exist between our interagency partners in the National Capital Region and the Department of Defense – a partnership and a commitment to serve the American people that no adversary can destroy."

The plaque presented by the U.S. Army Military District of Washington to the Washington Field Office reads: "This Pentagon Stone is presented to Federal Bureau of Investigation in memory of those who lost their lives and the heroes who responded on 11 September 2001, and in recognition of our "partnership" and shared responsibility to serve the American People."

The speakers at the ceremony included (in order): Mr. Michael Rolince, Retired FBI, (Section Chief, Counterterrorism Division, FBI Headquarters on 9/11); Deputy Assistant Director John G. Perren, Criminal Investigation Division, FBI Headquarters (Supervisory Special Agent for the WFO's Joint Terrorism Task Force on 9/11); Major General Karl R. Horst, Joint Force Headquarters, National Capital Region and the U.S. Army Military District of Washington; Assistant Director in Charge James W. McJunkin, FBI Washington Field Office.

In addition to the FBI Washington Field Office, the pieces of stone are being presented to Arlington County Fire Department and the New York City Fire Department. A fourth piece of stone will be displayed by the Military District of Washington in a place of honor at Fort McNair.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...