Skip to main content

Former Employee of Non-Profit Indicted in Kickback Scheme

BOSTON—A former employee of a non-profit organization that provides support services to developmentally disabled adults was arraigned today in federal court for soliciting, demanding, and accepting kickbacks.

CHARLES FEENEY, 56, of North Billerica, the former facilities director of non-profits Walnut Street Center (WSC) and Community Alternative Residential Environment, Inc. (CARE), was charged in a two-count indictment for kickbacks in connection with the renovation of a building that now serves, in part, as a day facility for disabled adults.

According to the indictment, FEENEY was one of the principal WSC and CARE representatives administering the renovation on behalf of the non-profits. The indictment alleges that in 2006, FEENEY approached a contractor and proposed to award him/her the general contract to renovate the building. In exchange, FEENEY demanded that the contractor award the electrical subcontract on the renovation to FEENEY’s private electrical business.

The indictment alleges that FEENEY ultimately received more than $180,000 in payments from the contractor in connection with the renovation. It is alleged that these payments included, among others: $7,500 to reimburse FEENEY for the purchase of a bucket truck that was not required for the renovation but that FEENEY wanted for use in his private business; and $7,500 for windows, even though the contractor himself purchased the windows and even though he hired a different subcontractor to install them.

It is further alleged that in order to inflate his profits in connection with the electrical subcontract, FEENEY arranged to place some of the individuals whom he had engaged to perform electrical work on the renovation on WSC’s payroll. These individuals allegedly continued performing electrical work on the renovation while being paid by WSC. Accordingly, WSC and CARE paid twice for portions of the electrical work on the project—directly via the WSC payroll, and indirectly via the subcontract with FEENEY’s company.

If convicted on these charges, FEENEY faces up to 10 years’ imprisonment, to be followed by up to three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine on each count.

United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz; Cortez Richardson, Special Agent in Charge of the Department of Housing and Urban Development - Office of Inspector General; Richard DesLauriers, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation - Boston Field Division; and Gregory W. Sullivan, Inspector General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts made the announcement today. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd F. Braunstein of Ortiz’s Economic Crimes Unit.

The details contained in the indictment are allegations. The defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...