Skip to main content

New Jersey businessman, company plead guilty to contracting fraud

NEWARK, N.J. - A New Jersey-based defense contracting company and its president pleaded guilty Monday to contracting fraud following an investigation by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).

Eric Helf, 38, president of Staff Manufacturing Corporation (Staff Gasket), admitted April 18 to military contract procurement fraud for selling replacement parts for use in military operations, U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced. Staff Gasket also pleaded guilty to violating the Arms Export Control Act.

Staff Gasket, located in Alpine, N.J., pleaded guilty to two charges of wire fraud and an export control violation. Helf, of New York, N.Y., pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with the scheme. Both Helf and the company entered guilty pleas before U.S. District Judge William J. Martini in Newark federal court.

According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court, from August 2004 through March 2006, Staff Gasket entered into contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to provide replacement parts for use in military operations. Many of the parts to be supplied under DoD contracts were deemed Critical Application Items that were required to be manufactured in the United States to the exact specifications in the contracts.

Instead, Staff Gasket contracted with manufacturers outside the United States which manufactured the items at a much cheaper price per unit than the U.S.-made product.

As a result of its cheaper and inferior product, Staff Gasket was able to win DoD contract awards by using lower bids that violated the terms required by DoD for requests for quotes and contracts. Staff Gasket's actions caused DoD to sustain $751,091 in losses in connection with the fraudulent contracts. Helf admitted to a particular instance of wire fraud relating to one of the fraudulently obtained contracts.

Under the terms of the plea agreement, Staff Gasket agreed to pay full restitution to DoD for the losses, and to forfeit an additional $50,000. Staff Gasket is also subject to a fine of between $728,000 and $1,456,000. Helf agreed to forfeit $49,926.

The count to which he pleaded guilty carries a maximum potential penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Sentencing is currently scheduled for Aug. 2.

U.S. Attorney Fishman credited special agents from DoD's Defense Criminal Investigative Service, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Edward T. Bradley, and ICE HSI Special Agent in Charge Peter T. Edge, for the investigation leading to the guilty pleas. The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Philip James Degnan of the U.S. Attorney's Office National Security Unit in Newark.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...