Skip to main content

Marketing Company Executive Pleads Guilty to Perjury in Connection with Investigation of Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc.

Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, George Speranza, the operator of a marketing company that created and published Internet websites, pleaded guilty to a perjury charge and admitted that he gave false testimony before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with the SEC’s investigation of Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. When sentenced by United States District Judge Dora L. Irizarry, Speranza faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison.

The guilty plea was announced by Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

As alleged in a superseding indictment and other court filings by the government, between approximately January 2007 and May 2010, the chief officers of Spongetech, together with others, executed a fraudulent scheme to (a) publicly report false and materially overstated sales figures to create artificial demand for, and increase the share price and trading volume of, Spongetech common stock; (b) issue restricted Spongetech common stock to entities controlled by Spongetech; (c) un-restrict and sell that stock; and (d) personally profit from the stock sales.

In 2009, the SEC commenced an investigation into Spongetech’s publicly reported sales figures and financial statements and as part of that investigation issued a subpoena to Speranza. Speranza appeared before an officer of the SEC and, in response to questions, lied under oath about aspects of work he performed for Spongetech as they related to creating websites and establishing virtual offices for purported customers of Spongetech. Specifically, Speranza lied about when he initially discussed creating the websites for Spongetech, and who at Spongetech asked him to establish the websites and virtual offices.

“It is essential that the SEC have accurate and complete information about publicly traded companies so that it can carry out its mission to protect investors from fraud,” stated United States Attorney Lynch. “This office will vigorously investigate and prosecute those who knowingly give false testimony to the SEC.” Ms. Lynch extended her grateful appreciation to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Securities and Exchange Commission for their assistance in this case.

The government’s case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys William E. Schaeffer and Jeffrey A. Goldberg.

The Defendant:
GEORGE SPERANZA
Age: 44
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...
1 comment
Read more

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...
5 comments
Read more