Skip to main content

FORMER PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF NARAL PRO-CHOICE NY PLEADS GUILTY TO FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the guilty plea of KELLI CONLIN, 53, to one count of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony.

CONLIN served as the Executive Director and President of NARAL Pro-Choice NY (NARAL) and the National Institute for Reproductive Health (NIRH), both non-profit entities located at 470 Park Avenue South in Manhattan from 1992 to 2010. During CONLIN’s tenure, NARAL became a leading advocate in the pro-choice and women’s health movements. The organizations’ Boards of Directors removed CONLIN as President and Executive Director in early 2011 after an internal audit revealed the spending and accounting improprieties that led to today’s disposition.

The investigation leading to today’s guilty plea revealed that beginning in 2007 until 2010, while working for NARAL and NIRH, CONLIN submitted credit card expenditure sheets and reimbursement check requests that contained false descriptions of her expenditures, seeking reimbursement for personal expenditures by claiming they were related to the business of the organizations. In particular, she claimed as business expenses personal meals, child care costs, car service expenses, and clothing purchases, as well as a summer rental house in the Hamptons. To conceal her conduct, CONLIN told her staff that certain expenditures were authorized by the Board. In fact, many of the expenditures were not Board-authorized, although because of the nature and duration of CONLIN’s conduct, an exact amount of loss to the non-profits is impossible to quantify.

“There is a special trust placed in the leadership of non-profit organizations,” said District Attorney Vance. “Kelli Conlin was a leader in the pro-choice movement and a powerful advocate for women, but she treated the organizations’ funds as her own, betraying the trust of the donors she solicited. When people contribute their hard-earned dollars to non-profit organizations, they should be assured that their funds will be expended only for appropriate purposes.”

CONLIN is expected to be sentenced to a non-incarceratory sentence and will be ordered to pay restitution to NARAL and NIRH in the amount of $75,000.

Assistant District Attorney Julieta Lozano led the investigation into this case, and Investigative Analyst Song Mee Yoon-Smith of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau, Rackets Investigator Jonathan Reid, and Investigator Sam Ahdout assisted in the investigation. Assistant District Attorneys Christopher Conroy and Richard Weber, Deputy Chief and Chief, respectively, of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau, supervised the investigation.

District Attorney Vance thanked NARAL and NIRH for their cooperation in the investigation.


Defendant Information:

KELLI CONLIN, 04/02/1958
Brooklyn, N.Y.

Convicted:


Falsifying Business Records, a class E felony, one count

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...