Skip to main content

Suffolk County Police have arrested two men for using identifying information of eight business in Suffolk County on National Grid rebate applications, costing the utility approximately $100,000 in energy rebates.

Starting in September 2009, Ralph Bianco, 53, and John Glaser, 53, applied for energy efficiency rebates using the identifying information of eight businesses in Suffolk County. National Grid offered an Energy Efficiency Program for commercial properties to perform upgrades that would conserve energy. Bianco, a heating and air-conditioning technician, applied for rebates under the program with the assistance of Glaser, who was employed by National Grid. The efficiency upgrades were not performed and the applications were submitted without the knowledge of the business owners.

The fraud was revealed approximately two months ago when an Amityville business owner became suspicious upon learning that someone had applied for a rebate using his company’s information. A rebate was never issued because the tax identification number for the business was not included on the fraudulent application. Following the business owner’s complaint, both National Grid and the Suffolk County Police Identity Theft Unit began an investigation.

Bianco represented himself under the business name JMR Energy and applied for and received rebate checks valued between $7,200 and $10,000 from National Grid. The applications generally were submitted using existing business names, addresses, tax identification numbers and National Grid account numbers.

Bianco, of 102 Copeland Place, Farmingdale, and Glaser, of 239 Tremont Ave., Lindenhurst, were both charged with one count of Grand Larceny 2nd Degree, and 11 counts of Identity Theft 1st Degree. Glaser was arraigned today at First District Court in Central Islip. Bianco surrendered today at the First Precinct, in West Babylon, and is scheduled to be arraigned on June 8.

The Identity Theft Unit is continuing its investigation and believes there are possibly 50 to 60 other business locations that may have been affected by the scam. Detectives are asking anyone with information regarding this case to call anonymously to Crime Stoppers at 1-800-220-TIPS.

A criminal charge is an accusation. A defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...