Skip to main content

HAO “HOWIE” WANG PLEADED GUILTY TO STEALING MORE THAN $1.1 MILLION FROM J.P. MORGAN CHASE

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the guilty plea of HAO “HOWIE” WANG, 28, for stealing more than $1.1 million from JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMC”) and stealing the identities of four victims. WANG pled guilty to Grand Larceny in the First Degree, Identity Theft in the First Degree, Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, Forgery in the Second Degree, and Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree.

“The defendant took advantage of his access to the confidential files and accounts of customers who entrusted their money to JPMorgan Chase & Co.,” said District Attorney Vance. “Last year, we formed the Major Economic Crimes Bureau, a consolidation and enhancement of our existing resources, to fight these kinds of crimes. This Office remains committed to bringing to justice employees at financial institutions who abuse their positions to commit larceny.”

WANG is a former business banker at JPMC. According to documents filed in court, WANG’s criminal scheme occurred between February 2008 and February 2009. During that period, the defendant used various methods to conduct his scheme. For example, on or around February 28, 2008, the defendant fraudulently obtained a loan from JPMC in the amount of $100,000 by using the identity of a particular person without that individual’s knowledge or authorization. The defendant created false bank documents in the name of this victim, who was not a JPMC customer, causing the bank records to appear as the victim opened the account and applied for the loan himself. Subsequently, $90,000 of the stolen money was transferred to bank accounts outside of the United States. WANG then depleted the remaining $10,000 via debit card purchases and cash withdrawals.

According to documents filed in court, several months later, in June 2008, WANG stole the identity of an actual JPMC customer and falsified business documents to create a fictitious account, Future Global Co. Ltd., in that victim’s name. WANG then fraudulently transferred $250,000 from the individual’s authorized JPMC account into the fictitious account. Subsequently, WANG transferred $200,000 of the stolen money to bank accounts outside of the United States, and used $46,000 to purchase an Audemars Piguet watch. In February 2009, the defendant stole the identities of two additional JPMC customers. Using these stolen identities, the defendant was able to transfer $139,536 and $700,000 from the victims’ bank accounts to bank accounts outside of the United States.

Assistant District Attorneys Vimi Bhatia and James Cesarano of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau prosecuted this case under the supervision of Michele Shulman, Deputy Chief of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau, and Richard Weber, Chief of the Major Economic Crimes Bureau and Deputy Chief of the Investigation Division. Chief Investigator John Bilich, Supervising Rackets Investigator Jose Flores, Senior Rackets Investigator Terrence V. Hayes, and analysts Aaron Davidowitz and Samantha Gillespie also assisted in the investigation and prosecution of the defendant.

District Attorney Vance also thanked the High Intensity Financial Crimes Area for the New York Region, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program, Port Authority Police of New York and New Jersey, and the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office for their assistance.



Defendant Information:



HAO (“HOWIE”) WANG, D.O.B. 9/28/82

Newark, New Jersey



Convicted:

Grand Larceny in the First Degree, a class B felony, one count
Identity Theft in the First Degree, a class D felony, twelve counts
Forgery in the Second Degree, a class D felony, five counts
Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree, a class E felony, four counts
Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, a class E felony, one count

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...