Skip to main content

Walter Shimoon Pled Guilty in Manhattan Federal Court to Insider Trading Charges

PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced today that WALTER SHIMOON pled guilty in Manhattan federal court to conspiracy and securities fraud charges arising from schemes in which he provided confidential information, including material, nonpublic information (“Inside Information”), to employees and clients of an expert-networking firm (the “Firm”). SHIMOON also provided Inside Information to a consultant who operated a research firm (the “Consultant”) and then provided the information to certain money managers. SHIMOON pled guilty before U.S. District Judge JED S. RAKOFF.

According to the information, a complaint previously filed in this case, and statements made during today’s guilty plea proceeding:

At all relevant times, SHIMOON worked as a director of Bbusiness development at Flextronics International, Ltd. (“Flextronics”), a technology company that designed, engineered, and manufactured electronics products. During that time, SHIMOON obtained confidential information, including Inside Information, concerning Flextronics; customers of Flextronics, including Apple, Inc. (“Apple”); and suppliers of Flextronics, including OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (“OVTI”). SHIMOON then provided this information to employees and clients of the Firm and to the Consultant.

For example, SHIMOON provided Inside Information concerning OVTI’s revenues to an employee of a hedge fund located in White Plains, New York, that was a client of the Firm. The hedge fund subsequently executed securities transactions in OVTI and earned profits of over $750,000. On another occasion, SHIMOON disclosed to the Consultant, and, separately, to a cooperating witness who claimed to represent a Firm client, that Apple would be launching a new iPhone in 2010 that would contain two cameras. The cameras would give iPhone users the ability to videoconference, which was a significant enhancement over prior generations of the iPhone. SHIMOON knew that disclosure of this and other information violated fiduciary duties he owed to Flextronics, and/or violated non-disclosure agreements executed between Flextronics and Apple.

The Firm paid SHIMOON approximately $18,000 for the consultation services he provided from mid-2008 to 2010. The Consultant in turn paid SHIMOON approximately $27,500 for providing confidential information, including Inside Information.

SHIMOON, 39, of San Diego, California, pled guilty to two counts of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud (Counts One and Two), and one count of securities fraud (Count Three). He faces a statutory maximum of 30 years in prison. Specifically, Counts One and Two each carry a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and Count Three carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. SHIMOON also faces a maximum fine of $250,000, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense on each of Counts One and Two, and a maximum fine of $5 million, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense on Count Three. As part of his plea agreement, SHIMOON has agreed to forfeit the proceeds he obtained as a result of the offense.

SHIMOON is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge RAKOFF on July 8, 2013, at 4:00 p.m.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...