Skip to main content

Rock-Tenn To Pay $160,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Rock-Tenn Company, a packaging manufacturer in Conway, Ark., will pay $160,000 to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

The EEOC’s suit (Civil Action No. 4:08-CV-3127) charged that Rock-Tenn violated federal anti-discrimination law when it failed to take effective action to prevent the sexual harassment of female employees by a male co-worker. Although the company investigated the complaint, the EEOC said the harassment continued. The EEOC also contended that one of the women had been forced to resign due to the ongoing harassment.

Sexual harassment violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process.

“The EEOC remains committed to aggressively pursuing remedies for victims of sexual harassment in any work setting,” said Regional Attorney Faye A. Williams of the EEOC’s Memphis District Office, which has jurisdiction over Arkansas, Tennessee, and certain counties in Mississippi. “No one, man or woman, should have to endure such abuse in any workplace, whether factory, farm or Wall Street brokerage firm. The women who stood up to this misconduct have seen their courage vindicated.”

Pamela B. Dixon, an EEOC trial attorney, added, “Even though Rock-Tenn denied that it had violated the law, we are pleased that the parties worked cooperatively to resolve this lawsuit.”

In addition to the monetary relief, the consent decree settling the suit, approved by U.S. District Judge Brian S. Miller, enjoins Rock-Tenn from further discriminating against employees at its Conway facility on the basis of sex. Rock-Tenn will provide sexual harassment training to all personnel and post a notice reinforcing the company’s policies on Title VII. Rock-Tenn will also submit reports to the EEOC for a two-year period describing any complaints of sexual harassment, the investigation conducted by Rock-Tenn in response to each complaint and how Rock-Tenn resolved the complaint. Also, in the event of a complaint of sexual harassment at the Conway facility, Rock-Tenn will retrain all of the parties involved in the complaint on the requirements of Title VII with regard to sexual harassment.

According to its website, Rock-Tenn Company is one of North America's leading manufacturers of paperboard, containerboard, consumer and corrugated packaging. The company’s Conway plant manufactures consumer packaging which is primarily used for food packaging.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...