Skip to main content

JASON ITZLER INDICTED FOR PROMOTING PROSTITUTION THROUGH “ROCKSTAR MODELS & PARTYGIRLS” ESCORT AGENCY

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictment of JASON ITZLER, 44, for promoting prostitution and selling illegal drugs through an escort agency he operated called “Rockstar Models & Partygirls.” ITZLER is charged with Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree, Promoting Prostitution in the Third Degree, and Money Laundering in the Third and Fourth Degrees.[1]

“The defendant’s business promoted nothing but criminal activity - prostitution and illegal drugs,” District Attorney Vance said. “My Office and its Crime Strategies Unit—which is focused on learning crime trends and ‘hotspots’ in each neighborhood in Manhattan—were able to shut down the defendant’s illegal activities within only a few weeks of the escort agency’s start-up.”

According to documents filed in court and statements made on the record in court, ITZLER advertised his agency’s prostitution services on the Internet, charging several thousand dollars per hour. On July 25, 2011, ITZLER ordered a prostituted woman to meet a customer at a hotel in midtown Manhattan for three days. ITZLER received $19,500 from the customer for her services. During that time, ITZLER visited the hotel room on two separate occasions and sold cocaine to the customer for $4,700. ITZLER is also charged with money laundering for conducting financial transactions with the customer’s checks.

Assistant District Attorney Eugene Hurley is prosecuting this case, under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney Warren Murray, Chief of Trial Bureau 50, and Executive Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman-Agnifilo, Chief of the Trial Division. Crime Strategies Unit Assistant District Attorney Reynaldo Cabrera assisted with the investigation.

Defendant Information:

JASON ITZLER, D.O.B. 2/23/1967
New York, NY

Charges:
• Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the Third Degree, a class B felony, 2 counts
• Promoting Prostitution in the Third Degree, a class D felony, 1 count
• Money Laundering in the Third Degree - Promoting Criminal Conduct, a class D felony, 1 count
• Money Laundering in the Third Degree - Concealing Proceeds, a class D felony, 1 count
• Money Laundering in the Fourth Degree - Promoting Criminal Conduct, a class E felony, 3 counts
• Money Laundering in the Fourth Degree - Concealing Proceeds, a class E felony, 3 counts

A class B felony is punishable by up to 25 years in prison, a class D felony is punishable by up to 7 years in prison, and a class E felony is punishable by up to 4 years in prison.

[1]The charges contained in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...