Skip to main content

Simon Property Group To Pay $125,000 To Settle EEOC National Origin Discrimination Lawsuit

LAS VEGAS — The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today announced the $125,000 settlement of a national origin harassment lawsuit it had filed against Simon Property Group, Inc., which identifies itself as the largest real estate company in the United States. The EEOC had charged that Latino janitors working for the company were subjected to daily verbal attacks because of their national origin. Simon Property Group owns and/or manages various shopping malls throughout the country, including the Forum Shops at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, the site where the EEOC said the abuse occurred.

According to the EEOC’s suit, a housekeeping shift leader, who was white, had harassed a class of Latino janitors on a daily basis beginning in 2005, subjecting them to verbal abuse, including slurs. Over a dozen Latino janitors submitted a written petition that same year complaining about the shift leader, but they perceived that nothing was done to stop the harassment. The EEOC alleged that the harassment continued for another year, until the supervisor was finally terminated for other reasons.

The EEOC originally filed suit against the company in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada (EEOC v. Simon Property Group, Inc., Case No. 2:09-cv-01178), alleging that the conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The parties entered into a two-year consent decree providing monetary relief for at least five harassment victims along with injunctive relief designed to prevent and appropriately deal with future instances of harassment. The consent decree also requires that Simon Property retain a consultant to monitor and track complaints in Nevada; provide anti-harassment and anti-discrimination training for staff; and report compliance efforts to the EEOC.

“We commend Simon Property for reinforcing measures to prevent future instances of harassment and discrimination,” said Anna Y. Park, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Los Angeles District Office, which has jurisdiction over southern Nevada. “National origin discrimination issues are on the rise and we are committed to vigorously enforcing federal laws to ensure workplaces free of harassment and discrimination.”

Adriana Lopez, acting director for the EEOC’s Las Vegas Local Office, added, “We encourage workers to report harassment as they did here in this case. We equally encourage employers to take proactive steps to stop harassment and to take swift action when it does occur.”

According to its website, Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group is an S&P 500 company with ownership or property interest in 392 properties throughout North America, Europe and Asia, generating annual retail sales in excess of $60 billion in the United States.

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...