Skip to main content

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES SENTENCING IN MIDTOWN ARSON CASE

Daniel Phillips Sentenced to 10 Years In Prison For Setting Major Fire in Residential Building

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the sentencing of DANIEL PHILLIPS, 32, to 10 years in prison to be followed by five years post-release supervision, as well as $10,000 in restitution. On November 1, 2010, the defendant was convicted at trial on charges of Arson in the Second Degree, Criminal Mischief in the Second Degree, and Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree, for starting a fire at 410 West 48th Street, a six-story apartment building with approximately 71 residents.

“It must have been terrifying for the residents and families fleeing this fire to find flames and smoke blanketing their building’s stairwell in the middle of the night,” said District Attorney Vance. “The defendant had every reason to believe that setting this fire would endanger every resident in the building, but he did it anyway, causing extensive damage and displacing residents on a bitterly cold winter night. Apart from jeopardizing lives, the safety of firefighters responding to the scene was also compromised.”

As proven at trial, the defendant attended a party in the building during the early morning hours of January 25, 2009. PHILLIPS got into an argument with another individual, and was asked to leave by the host at approximately 4:30 a.m. The defendant left the apartment and the building and, within moments, he returned and set a fire underneath a stairwell on the first floor, where the recycling and garbage bins were kept. The fire and smoke traveled up the stairwell, blowing out the skylight on the roof, and causing significant fire damage to the stairwell and smoke damage to the majority of apartments. On a 14-degree night, dozens of people in the building were evacuated, many via fire escapes. The fire caused more than $320,000 in damage to the building itself.

District Attorney Vance thanked Assistant District Attorney Ryan Hayward, who prosecuted this case, under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney William Darrow, Chief of Trial Bureau 70. Former Trial Preparation Assistant Elaine Driscoll assisted at trial.


Defendant Information:

DANIEL PHILLIPS, 5/30/79
New York, NY

Convicted:

Arson in the Second Degree, a class B violent felony, one count
Criminal Mischief in the Second Degree, a class D felony, one count
Reckless Endangerment in the Second Degree, a class A misdemeanor

Sentenced:

10 years in state prison
5 years post-release supervision
$10,000 restitution

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...