Skip to main content

DA VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF WOMAN FOR HILTON HOTEL JOB SCAM

Defendant Katie Gaton Posed as Hilton Employee, Stole Money from Victims Seeking Jobs

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the indictment of KATIA GATON, 41, for defrauding individuals by telling them that she worked at the Hilton New York and could secure for them jobs at the hotel for a fee. The defendant stole more than $13,600 from at least five victims. GATON is charged in a five-count indictment with Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, and Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree.[1]

“Taking advantage of people searching for work in a tough economy is reprehensible,” said District Attorney Vance. “New Yorkers should be very wary of any supposed job opportunity that requires the payment of advance fees. I urge anyone who has been a victim of scams like this to call my Office at (212) 335-8900.”

According to documents filed in court, GATON is charged with operating a scam in which she told at least five individuals that she worked at the Hilton New York, and for a fee she could secure for them jobs such as front desk assistants, bellhops, and housekeepers. In fact, GATON was never employed by the Hilton New York, and job applications for the hotel can be submitted on-line without charge.

As part of her fraudulent scheme, GATON told her victims that the jobs were well-paying, and that they would work 40-50 hours per week. After the victims paid GATON an initial “application fee,” she brought them to the hotel, purportedly for an interview with a hotel manager. Once at the Hilton New York, GATON had the victims sit in the lobby while she disappeared. She later returned to explain that the manager was unexpectedly “unavailable,” and that they would have to come back later. She gave some victims tours of the public areas of the hotel. GATON then gave excuses to put off another trip to the hotel. She told some victims that they would be starting work very shortly, even giving them start dates. She extracted more money out of the victims by telling them they had to purchase work uniforms and shoes. Victims each paid GATON between $1,500 and $5,700.

Assistant District Attorney Om Gillett is prosecuting this case, under the supervision of Special Prosecutions Bureau Chief Thomas Wornom and Deputy Bureau Chiefs Judy Salwen and Archana Rao. Senior Investigator Mark Duggan of the District Attorney’s Investigations Bureau assisted in the investigation and arrest of the defendant, under the supervision of Chief Investigator John Bilich and Supervising Investigator Jose Flores.

District Attorney Vance thanked the Bronx District Attorney’s Office, specifically Bronx Assistant District Attorney Michelle Milanes, and Bronx District Attorney’s Office Senior Detective Investigator Juan Crosas-Medina for their assistance with the investigation.

DA Vance also thanked Anthony Spagnuolo, Director of Security and Safety at the Hilton New York, and Jennifer Tormey, Assistant Director of Human Resources at the Hilton New York for their assistance.

[1] The charges contained in the indictment are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Defendant information:

KATIA GATON, D.O.B. 11/30/1970
New York, N.Y.

Charges:
• Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, a class E felony, 1 count
• Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, a class D felony, 1 count
• Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, a class E felony, 3 counts

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...