Skip to main content

South Texas man pleads guilty to cocaine-trafficking conspiracy

CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas – A south Texas man pleaded guilty on Monday to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine, announced U.S. Attorney Kenneth Magidson, Southern District of Texas.

The investigation leading to the criminal charges was conducted in Corpus Christi by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), the Drug Enforcement Administration, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Internal Revenue Service's Criminal Investigations and the Corpus Christi Police Department.

Jose Garza aka "Cano," 24, is from Sullivan City, Texas. He was indicted on July 17, 2008, alleging he participated in a cocaine-trafficking conspiracy from about June 2006 through April 2008. After being a fugitive for almost four years, Garza turned himself in to law enforcement officials in McAllen, Texas, on Jan. 30, 2012.

The government's evidence indicated Garza was involved in a large-scale cocaine-trafficking conspiracy based in Sullivan City. Garza was employed by members of this conspiracy to deliver cocaine and conduct counter-surveillance activities.

More than 20 members of this conspiracy have already been arrested and convicted, and more than $5 million in assets seized and forfeited by the United States, including multiple pieces of real property and U.S. currency.

Senior U.S. District Judge Janis Graham Jack accepted the guilty plea on Mar. 5 and set sentencing for May 24. Garza faces up to life imprisonment and a maximum fine of $4 million.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...