Skip to main content

Daniel Everett Sentenced to 32 Years to Life in Prison for 2008 Murder Following Trial Conviction

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the sentencing of DANIEL EVERRET, 20, to 32 years to life in prison. On March 27, 2012, the defendant was convicted by a jury in New York State Supreme Court on all of the charges in the indictment: Murder in the Second Degree, Assault in the First Degree, and Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree, for firing seven shots into a crowd in 2008, killing 13-year-old Scotty Scott and injuring two others.

“The defendant fired seven shots wildly, recklessly, and with a sheer disregard for life into a crowd,” said District Attorney Vance. “He waved his arm from side to side, spraying people with bullets. As a result of this senseless gang violence, a young life was lost, two people were seriously wounded, and a neighborhood will never be the same.

“My heart goes out to the mother of Scotty Scott. I would also like to commend the bravery of the witnesses who came forward at great personal risk to testify at trial, despite the defendant’s efforts to prevent them from doing so. This case reached a successful conclusion thanks to the determination of the law enforcement personnel that refused to close the books on this case.”

As proven at trial, at approximately 7:30 p.m. on September 5, 2008, an argument erupted between members of two of Manhattan’s violent criminal street gangs – the Lenox Boys and 2MF (“2 Mafia Family” or 2DEEP) – on opposite sides of 7th Avenue at the corner of West 144th Street. The argument escalated into a fight between the rival gang members. EVERRET, a member of 2MF, retrieved a 9-millimeter semi-automatic weapon that belonged to the gang as a whole, and fired seven shots in the direction of approximately 15-20 Lenox Boys, 2MF members, and their young followers and associates, who had gathered to watch or take part in the fight. Two bullets pierced Scott’s heart, lungs, liver, and leg; he died at the scene.

A second victim, who was 18 years old at the time of the shooting and a member of 2 MF, was struck in his knee, which fractured his leg. A bullet fired by the defendant also grazed the head of a third victim, a Lenox Boy who was 16 at the time of the shooting, causing bleeding to his brain. He survived.

District Attorney Vance thanked Assistant District Attorneys Dafna Yoran and N. David Neeman for prosecuting this case, under the supervision of Assistant District Attorneys William Darrow, Chief of Trial Bureau 70; and Assistant District Attorney John Irwin, Deputy Chief of the Trial Division. Trial Preparation Assistant Kathleen Coulson also assisted with the case.
District Attorney Vance also thanked the members of the NYPD’s 32nd Precinct Squad, especially Detectives Christopher Killen and Mike Langella.

Defendant Information:

DANIEL EVERRET, D.O.B. 6/22/1991
New York, N.Y.

Convicted:

Murder in the Second Degree, a class B felony, one count
Assault in the First Degree, a class B felony, two counts
Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree, a class C felony, two counts

Sentenced:

32 years to life

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...