Skip to main content

Bronx Couple Plead Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court To The Sexual Exploitation Of A Child

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and James T. Hayes, Jr., the Special Agent-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (“ICE”) Homeland Security Investigations (“HSI”), announced that INOCENCIA ORTEGA and her husband, LUCIANO MENDEZ-ROJAS, pled guilty in Manhattan federal court for engaging in conduct that led to the sexual exploitation of a child. ORTEGA pled guilty today to conspiring to commit the sexual exploitation of a child and making false statements relating to a sex offense before United States District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. MENDEZ-ROJAS pled guilty to committing the sexual exploitation of a child and distributing child pornography before Judge Engelmayer on June 11, 2012.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said: “Child pornography is pernicious in all of its forms and it is something that will not be tolerated by this Office.”

ICE HSI Special Agent-in-Charge James T. Hayes, Jr. said: “Inocencia Ortega and Luciano Mendez-Rojas created a most unhealthy domestic atmosphere for their children by repeatedly exposing them to explicit activity. Mendez-Rojas also downloaded and distributed images and videos of other children engaged in explicit activity. These pleas bring an end to their abusive behavior and are a significant victory for all of us who want to keep these sexual predators from hurting children.”

According to the second Superseding Indictment, the Superseding Information, other court documents, and the defendants’ plea allocutions:

In July 2011, MENDEZ-ROJAS and ORTEGA engaged in sexually explicit conduct in their home in the Bronx, New York, while their minor child (the “Victim”) filmed videos of the conduct at the direction of MENDEZ-ROJAS.

On February 9, 2011, MENDEZ-ROJAS distributed child pornography over the Internet using file-sharing software.

Furthermore, in connection with the investigation, ORTEGA falsely stated to HSI agents that her children, including the Victim, never told her that they had seen child pornography. In fact, the Victim had already told ORTEGA that he/she had seen a video containing child pornography on a computer in the family’s home.

* * *

MENDEZ-ROJAS, 38, and ORTEGA, 35, are both citizens of Mexico. MENDEZ-ROJAS faces a maximum sentence of 50 years in prison with a 15 year mandatory minimum. He is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Engelmayer on October 12, 2012. ORTEGA faces a maximum sentence of 13 years in prison. She is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Engelmayer on October 19, 2012.

Mr. Bharara praised the outstanding investigative work of ICE HSI.

The prosecution is being handled by the Office’s General Crimes Unit. Assistant United States Attorneys Kristy J. Greenberg and Daniel C. Richenthal are in charge of the prosecution.

ICE HSI encourages the public to report suspected child predators and any suspicious activity through its toll-free hotline at 1-866-347-2423. This hotline is staffed around the clock by investigators.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...