Skip to main content

Frank A. Mora to Pay $43,000 to Settle Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

McALLEN, Texas – Frank A. Mora, individually, and as the authorized corporate officer of Two Lac, Inc. d/b/a Oasis One Dry Cleaners, a McAllen, Texas dry cleaning and laundry service, will pay $43,000 and provide significant remedial relief to a former female employee who was subjected to a sexually hostile work environment, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced today.

The EEOC’s suit (Civil Action Number 7:11-cv-209) filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division, charged that a female employee at Oasis Dry Cleaners routinely experienced sexual harassment from its general manager who solicited sexual favors and often approached her speaking in a suggestive manner and placing his hands on her body.

Such alleged behavior violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex discrimination, including sexual harassment. The EEOC filed suit after first attempting to settle the case through its conciliation process.

In addition to providing $43,000 in monetary damages to the former employee, the two-year Consent Decree resolving the case enjoins Frank A. Mora, individually, and as the authorized corporate officer of Two Lac, Inc. d/b/a Oasis One Dry Cleaners from discriminating against employees based on sex and requires the following:

Adoption, implementation and distribution of a bilingual Spanish/English sexual harassment and retaliation policy;
Two hours of bilingual Spanish/English training to all employees, officials, managers and supervisors working at the dry cleaning facility located at 120 E. Nolana, McAllen, Texas; and
Posting notices in Spanish and English of the intent to comply with Title VII.

“Employees have a legal right to go to work every day without the anxiety of being subjected to harassment related to their gender,” said EEOC Senior Trial Attorney David Rivela of the agency’s San Antonio Field Office. “We are pleased that Mr. Mora is taking the steps necessary to provide a discrimination-free environment for his personnel.”

Janet Elizondo, Acting District Director for the Dallas District Office which oversees San Antonio, said, “I think this case is a great example of how the Commission remains diligent in its enforcement efforts to root out sexual harassment in the workplace.”

Judith G. Taylor, Supervisory Trial Attorney of the San Antonio Field Office, added, “Here, the employer’s hiring a family member to manage day-to-day operations appears to have resulted in the failure to acknowledge or address an employee’s complaint that the family member was engaging in sexually harassing conduct. Businesses should exercise care to avoid discriminatory actions or inactions motivated by familiarity.”

In fiscal year 2011, 11,364 charges of sexual harassment were filed with the EEOC and state or local agencies nationwide.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...