Skip to main content

FORMER GOLDMAN SACHS PROGRAMMER CHARGED WITH ILLEGALLY TAKING PROPRIETARY COMPUTER CODE

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the arrest and arraignment of SERGEY ALEYNIKOV, 42, on a felony complaint charging him with accessing and duplicating a complex proprietary and highly confidential computer source code owned by Goldman Sachs, a New York-based financial institution. ALEYNIKOV, a former computer programmer for Goldman Sachs, was charged in New York County Criminal Court with Unlawful Use of Secret Scientific Material and Unlawful Duplication of Computer Related Material[1].

“This code is so highly confidential that it is known in the industry as the firm’s ‘secret sauce,”’ said District Attorney Vance. “Employees who exploit their access to sensitive information should expect to face criminal prosecution in New York State in appropriate cases.”

According to the complaint and statements made on the record in court, ALEYNIKOV was employed by Goldman Sachs as a computer programmer from 2007 until 2009. His job responsibilities included developing and maintaining computer programs used to operate the bank’s high-frequency trading system, which allowed Goldman Sachs traders to make a large volume of trades in securities, commodities, and options based on trading decisions executed in fractions of a second. Trades are executed on the basis of algorithms that incorporate data from rapid market developments and past trades. Goldman Sachs’ programmers created its high-frequency trading system to maintain a competitive advantage.

In April 2009, ALEYNIKOV gave notice of his intent to quit his job at Goldman Sachs. The defendant had accepted a job offer from Teza, a trading firm in Chicago, where he was to be responsible for developing a high-frequency trading system to compete with Goldman Sachs.

According to the complaint, on June 5, 2009, ALEYNIKOV’s last day of work at Goldman Sachs, he copied and transferred hundreds of thousands of lines of source code for Goldman Sachs’ high-frequency trading system to a foreign server. This source code included trading algorithms used to determine the value of stock options.

Senior Investigative Counsel Joanne Y. Li is prosecuting the case under the supervision of Assistant District Attorney David Szuchman, Chief of the Cybercrime and Identity Theft Bureau. Supervising Rackets Investigator Robert Muldoon, Senior Rackets Investigator Jason Malone, Senior Cybercrime Analyst Jeremy Apple, and Cybercrime Analyst Bret Rubin also assisted in the investigation.

District Attorney Vance thanked Supervisory Special Agent Michael McSwain of the FBI’s New York Field Office.

District Attorney Vance also thanked Goldman Sachs for its assistance and cooperation in the investigation.


Defendant information:

SERGEY ALEYNIKOV, D.O.B. 2/6/1970

West Orange, NJ

Charges:

Unlawful Use of Secret Scientific Material, a class E felony, 1 count
Duplication of Computer Related Material, a class E felony, 1 count

[1]The charges contained in the complaint are merely allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...