Skip to main content

Court Rules Employer Refused to Provide Reasonable Accommodations and Failed to Hire Hearing-Impaired Applicant

PHOENIX -- A federal judge ruled yesterday ruled in favor of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) that a Phoenix company that provides services to the disabled illegally discriminated against a hearing-impaired job applicant.

Judge David Alan Ezra of U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona held as a matter of law that Creative Networks had failed to accommodate and hire a hearing-impaired applicant, Rochelle Duran, because of her disability. In its lawsuit filed Sept. 28, 2009, the EEOC charged that Creative Networks violated the Americans with Disabil­ities Act (ADA) by adhering to a rigid policy or practice of denying hearing-impaired applicants' requests for interpreting services costing more than $200 to complete its pre-employment orientation and training. (EEOC v. Creative Networks L.L.C., 09-CV-02023, D. Ariz.).

According to the court, "Creative Networks denied Duran an employment opportunity and the denial was based on her need for reasonable accommodations. Indeed, Defendant's failure to offer Duran reasonable accommoda­tions foreclosed her opportunity for employment by preventing her from proceeding further in the application process."

Such conduct violates Title I of the the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits private employers from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, and job training, and also mandates that employers provide reasonable accommo­dations to people with disabilities absent undue hardship. With this decision by the court, the case will go to trial on the issues of damages and injunctive relief.

EEOC Regional Attorney Mary Jo O'Neill said, "It's plainly against federal law for employers to refuse reasonable accommodations to qualified applicants and employees with disabilities. Employers should take advantage of the skills and assets that disabled individuals can offer, rather than denying them their rights under the law. Employers need to train and educate their work force on the need to treat disabled individuals lawfully and fairly rather than closing the door of opportunity on them."

Rayford O. Irvin, district director of the EEOC's Phoenix District Office, added, "I cannot emphasize enough how important it is for employers to take seriously their obligation to respect the rights of disabled applicants and employees. The EEOC will continue to exercise its mission to protect the rights of workers against discrimination."

Creative Networks, with over 1,000 employees, is a Phoenix-based subsidiary of ResCare, Inc. and a company that that provides services to disabled clients.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...