Skip to main content

NY Downtown Hospital Paid Illegal Kickbacks For Referrals To Unlicensed Drug And Alcohol Treatment Program, Billed Medicaid For Unnecessary Services

NEW YORK— Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman today announced that his office secured a $13.4 million settlement with New York Downtown Hospital to resolve a Medicaid fraud case involving illegal payments the hospital received on claims for unlicensed inpatient drug and alcohol treatment services and rendered to patients who were unlawfully referred there. The settlement also resolves charges that NY Downtown Hospital conspired with a for-profit out-of-state vendor of purported administrative services to submit false claims to Medicaid. Under the terms of the settlement, more than $12,600,000 will be returned to the Medicaid program, and $800,000 to the federal Medicare program.

“Drug and alcohol treatment programs are designed to help people struggling with addiction. By exploiting this need in order to maximize revenue, New York Downtown Hospital wasted Medicaid resources and illegally billed taxpayers for unlicensed and medically unnecessary treatment services,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “This settlement holds New York Downtown Hospital accountable for this scheme, and will make providers think twice before defrauding the Medicaid system. Together with our federal partners, we will leave no stone unturned in the fight to recover misappropriated money on behalf of New York’s taxpayers.”

The Attorney General charged that NY Downtown Hospital entered into an illegal patient referral scheme with an out-of-state vendor, SpecialCare Hospital Management Corp., disguised as an “administrative services agreement,” under which the hospital agreed to pay the vendor a monthly fee of $38,500 in exchange for the referral of Medicaid patients to its unlicensed inpatient detoxification unit. Referral of Medicaid patients for a fee violates federal and state anti-kickback laws and Medicaid regulations. Furthermore, state law requires a hospital to obtain an operating certificate from the New York Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services before it operates a discrete unit providing chemical dependency treatment or services, or holds itself out to the public in a manner that indicates the availability of chemical dependency programs, treatment or services.

The Attorney General’s complaint charged that NY Downtown Hospital marketed and provided the inpatient detoxification services even though it did not have an operating certificate to do so, and that NY Downtown Hospital and SpecialCare Hospital Management Corp. violated federal and state anti-kickback laws through SpecialCare’s referral of patients to the hospital for its New Vision program, in exchange for a fee paid by the hospital. The complaint also charged that the inpatient detoxification services provided by NY Downtown were not medically necessary, and failed to meet the professionally recognized standards of care.

The settlement followed a joint investigation by the Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit and the United States Attorney’s Office of False Claims Act after allegations were made by whistleblowers Mathew I. Gelfand, M.D. and Enrico Montaperto. Following their joint investigation, the Attorney General’s Office and the United States Attorney’s Office filed Complaints-In-Intervention against seven New York hospitals, SpecialCare Hospital Management Corp. and SpecialCare Chief Executive Officer Robert McNutt for making false claims to Medicaid and Medicare.

The whistleblowers originally filed complaints that alleged claims under New York’s False Claims Act, which authorizes persons who have uncovered fraud against the State to file claims on its behalf.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

The U-Turn of Candace Owens: From Liberal Critic to Conservative Firebrand

Candace Owens’s career has been defined by one of the most dramatic and controversial political transformations in modern media. In less than a decade, she transitioned from a liberal critic of the Republican Party to a leading voice of the American conservative movement, only to have her time at the top of established conservative media end over a final, divisive shift in rhetoric. Here is a look at the journey that defined her political evolution, culminating in her emergence as a powerful, independent media force. Phase 1: The Anti-Trump Democrat (Pre-2017) Before her political transformation, Candace Owens was known for holding typical liberal views and actively criticizing the Republican Party and its most controversial new figure. Initial Stance: Owens was an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, reportedly publishing articles mocking him and the "bat-s**t crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party." The Turning Point: This initial phase ended following a failed a...