Skip to main content

Two Real Estate Executives Sentencted In Manhattan Federal Court For $2.2 Million Fraud Scheme Involving Battery Park City Condominium Project

CHRISTOPHER DALY and MICHAEL ABREU, two former executives at the Sheldrake Organization (“Sheldrake”), a real estate development and management company, were sentenced in Manhattan federal court to 15 months and one year and one day in prison, respectively, for their roles in a scheme to fraudulently obtain $2.2 million from a foreign-owned bank (the “Lender”). DALY, who was the owner and President of Sheldrake, and ABREU, who was the Director of Asset Management, used the funds obtained from the Lender to support the construction and operation of “Riverhouse,” a $573 million luxury condominium project in Battery Park City. DALY and ABREU each pled guilty in April 2012 to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud. U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald sentenced ABREU today and DALY on September 20, 2012.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated: “The ‘double-dipping’ fraud in which these defendants engaged has earned them both prison terms as well as the forfeiture of their ill-gotten gains.”

According to the Information filed in Manhattan federal court and statements made during court proceedings:

The Battery Park City Authority (“BPCA”) is a New York state public benefit corporation in charge of the commercial and residential development and maintenance of a segment of downtown Manhattan. In 2004, BPCA solicited bids for the construction of the Riverhouse Project, which Sheldrake ultimately won.

As part of the project, Sheldrake secured financing from the Lender. When Sheldrake received invoices from BPCA relating to the Riverhouse Project, Sheldrake submitted them to the Lender for reimbursement. From the beginning of the Riverhouse Project in early 2006, Sheldrake struggled to make timely payments to BPCA on its invoices. As Sheldrake’s payment problems persisted throughout the fall of 2006, the company’s representatives, including DALY and ABREU, assured BPCA representatives that the outstanding invoices and late charges would be paid. Nevertheless, while Sheldrake made payment on some outstanding amounts owed to BPCA during the fall of 2006, it did not pay the balances in full.

In January 2007, DALY, ABREU, and a co-conspirator (“CC-1”) agreed to submit a fraudulent invoice from BPCA to the Lender for charges that had not yet been billed, and to which they were not yet entitled. The fraudulent invoice, in the amount of approximately $2.2 million, was submitted in February 2007. The Lender funded this invoice, among other payments, and wired the money to Sheldrake’s bank account in New York, New York.

When the real BPCA invoice for approximately $2.2 million was received by Sheldrake in July 2007, DALY signed a letter that was sent to the Lender requesting reimbursement a second time. Unaware that this charge had previously been funded, the Lender again funded the invoice request to Sheldrake and wired the money to Sheldrake’s bank account in New York, New York.

In addition to his prison term, DALY, 49, of New York, New York, was sentenced to 18 months of supervised release, ordered to pay $2.2 million in restitution to Sheldrake’s former business partner, a victim of the offense, and ordered to forfeit $500,000. In addition to his prison term, ABREU, 43, of Carmel, New York, was sentenced to one year of supervised release. He was also ordered to pay $2.2 million in restitution to Sheldrake’s former business partner, forfeit $62,500, and pay a $100 special assessment fee.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...