Skip to main content

Washington Voters Approve Gay Marriage

By NICK MCCANN

VANCOUVER, Wash. (CN) - Washington will become the ninth state to allow gay marriage after opponents conceded defeat Thursday. The state is the third, after Maine and Maryland, to approve gay marriage through popular vote.

With thousands of votes for Referendum 74 to still be counted, same-sex marriage supporters celebrated victory on Wednesday. Proponents projected that voters in the Seattle area would determine the outcome.

On Thursday afternoon, opponents of the referendum conceded defeat.

Gov. Chris Gregoire signed a gay marriage bill in February, but opponents submitted enough signatures to put the issue to a referendum in the general election.

The law will allow same-sex couples to marry, and domestic partnerships will be converted to marriages after 2014.
Zach Silk, campaign manager for Washington United for Marriage, called it a "historic day."

"We have always understood that there are good people on the other side of this issue," Silk said. "Yet, we remain confident that once people see how much marriage matters to families, they will realize that the love and commitment that marriage embodies only strengthens families, neighborhoods and communities."

Silk thanked voters, campaign workers, and the 20,000 people who donated to the cause.

The chairman of Preserve Marriage Washington, which fought the law, blamed the passage of the referendum on "Washington's political establishment and news media."

Joseph Backholm said The Seattle Times took "the unprecedented step of not just endorsing the referendum, but of actively campaigning for its approval."

The newspaper's editorial board endorsed the referendum, and offered discounted political ads for the campaign to legalize gay marriage.

Source: Courthouse News Service

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...