Skip to main content

East Elmhurst Man Pleads Guilty To Hiding $3.2 Million From The Internal Revenue Service In Foreign Bank Accounts

Earlier today at the federal courthouse in Central Islip, New York, Mohanbhai Ramchandani, of East Elmhurst, New York, pled guilty to violating the United States Treasury Department’s Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts Report law (FBAR) and filing false tax returns to conceal $3.2 million that he earned from his Manhattan-based tailoring business – Mohan’s Custom Tailors. According to court filings and facts presented during the plea proceeding, Ramchandani admitted the illegal activity and cooperated with Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agents after being confronted with the evidence against him.

The guilty plea was announced by Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Toni Weirauch, Special Agent-in-Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation, New York.

Ramchandani built a successful business that made millions. Rather than live up to his financial responsibilities, he sought to conceal in foreign banks $3.2 million of income clearly earned in the United States. Ramchandani tried to evade not just lawful tax reporting obligations but also the laws that protect our economy,” stated United States Attorney Lynch. “Ramchandani not only grossly underreported his true income, he completely underestimated the tenacity of the IRS to ‘follow the money’.”

IRS Special Agent-in-Charge Weirauch stated, “Offshore tax enforcement is a major priority for the Internal Revenue Service. Individuals who chose to hide income outside of the United States expose themselves to a variety of criminal charges, including criminal tax and FBAR violations, and severe penalties. As we continue to gain access to more and more information about individuals involved in offshore tax evasion, potential violators can expect us to use all of our enforcement tools to stop this abuse.”

The government’s investigation revealed that Ramchandani operated a lucrative custom tailoring business specializing in the manufacturing of suits and shirts. Customers paid for their purchases with cash, checks and credit cards, including American Express. Ramchandani sent checks that American Express issued to him for payment of his customers’ purchases to the Bank of India in Hong Kong where he held an account. He then transferred those proceeds to an account held at the same bank in his son’s name, as well as to other banks in India and Canada. Between 2007 and 2009, Ramchandani hid $3.2 million in the foreign bank accounts and, in violation of FBAR laws, failed to report that he had money in those accounts. Ramchandani also filed tax returns that failed to include the money that he sent overseas. The tax loss to the IRS for 2007, 2008 and 2009 was $736,002.00.

Today’s guilty plea took place before United States District Judge Joseph F. Bianco. When sentenced, Ramchandani faces up to five years in prison, a penalty of $1.6 million for the FBAR violation and restitution to the IRS of $736,002.00 for unpaid taxes.

The government’s case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Demetri M. Jones.

The Defendants:

MOHANBHAI RAMCHANDANI
Age: 66

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...