Skip to main content

Two Kinds of Hate: Understanding the Difference Between Nazi Germany and Jim Crow America

It's a really tough and uncomfortable question to ask: how different was the racism of Nazi Germany from the racism in the United States, especially during the time of Jim Crow laws? Both periods involved horrific discrimination, violence, and the idea that one race was superior to another. But digging a bit deeper, we find some crucial differences in their ultimate goals and how their societies were structured.

Let's break it down:

Hitler's Germany: A Quest for "Purity" and Annihilation
Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany was built on an extreme and terrifying idea: the world needed to be "purified" by getting rid of "inferior" races.

Top Dog Race: They believed in an "Aryan master race" (mostly Northern Europeans, especially Germans) as the peak of humanity.
"Subhuman" and Targeted for Death: Groups like Jewish people, Roma (Gypsies), Slavic people, and Black people were labeled "subhuman." The goal wasn't just to discriminate against them, but to systematically eliminate them. This was the core of their state policy, leading to the Holocaust.
Total Control: Nazi Germany was a totalitarian state – meaning the government had total control over everything and everyone. Individual rights didn't matter; only the state and its "master race" ideology did.
Expand and Conquer: They wanted to conquer vast territories in Eastern Europe, kill or enslave the people living there, and create "living space" for their "pure" Germans.
Jim Crow America: Keeping a Race Down, Not Wiping Them Out
In the United States, especially in the South, Jim Crow laws created a system of extreme racial segregation and oppression against African Americans.

White Over Black: This system was based on "white supremacy" – the belief that white people were naturally better than Black people and deserved to be in charge.
Segregation and Control, Not Genocide: While African Americans faced immense violence (like lynching), economic exploitation, and were denied basic rights, the system's main goal was to keep them in a subordinate, second-class position. It wasn't about mass extermination.
Flawed Democracy: The U.S. still claimed to be a democracy with a Constitution promising liberty and justice. The tragic irony was that these promises were denied to Black Americans. This internal conflict, however, also provided the foundation for the later Civil Rights Movement to challenge and eventually dismantle Jim Crow.
Maintaining a Caste System: Jim Crow was about maintaining a strict social order where Black people were kept "in their place" through laws, customs, and terror.
The Key Takeaway: Different Goals, Different Horrors
Both systems were horrific and caused immense suffering based on racist beliefs. However, the fundamental difference lies in their ultimate goals:

Hitler's Germany: Aimed for extermination and racial purity on a massive, genocidal scale, driven by an expansionist, totalitarian ideology.
Jim Crow America: Aimed for subordination and segregation to maintain white dominance within its existing borders and a (flawed) democratic framework.
While the racism of Jim Crow America was deeply ingrained, violent, and utterly shameful, it did not have the explicit, state-driven goal of physically wiping out an entire racial group that defined Nazi Germany's "Final Solution." Understanding this distinction doesn't lessen the pain and injustice of either period, but it helps us grasp the unique nature of their respective evils.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...

Mortgage Fraud

Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced today the indictment of 13 individuals and a mortgage origination company for perpetrating over $100 million in mortgage fraud over a four-year period in the New York City metropolitan area. In addition, 12 individuals have already waived indictment and pleaded guilty to felonies relating to their participation in the mortgage fraud scheme. The indictment charges 13 individuals and the mortgage company, AFG FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., with enterprise corruption, grand larceny, scheme to defraud and conspiracy involving 19 fraudulent mortgage transactions. The defendants include the principals and a number of employees of the mortgage company, as well as bank employees, appraisers, and three attorneys. Two other attorneys are among the defendants who already pleaded guilty. The crimes charged in the indictment occurred between June 2004 and April 2009 with the bulk of the fraudulent closings occurring from mid-2005 through the end of...