A U.S. District Court judge in Nevada took a decisive step on August 21, 2025, against the companies behind schemes like IM Mastery Academy and their leaders. This isn't a final judgment, but a "preliminary injunction"—a powerful legal tool designed to press pause on alleged illegal activity while a case is being decided. Think of it as a legal freeze-frame that prevents further harm to consumers.
What's Happening in the Case?
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the State of Nevada have filed a complaint alleging that the defendants, including Chris and Isis Terry, ran a multi-level marketing (MLM) business that used false or baseless earnings claims to sell training on financial markets. According to the FTC, this scheme has caused over $1.2 billion in harm to consumers since 2018. The defendants allegedly targeted young people, using social media to flaunt luxurious lifestyles to draw them in. The preliminary injunction is a direct response to these allegations, ensuring the defendants can't continue the behavior while the lawsuit proceeds.
What the Injunction Prohibits
The court's order imposes strict limitations on the defendants, forcing them to preserve their assets and records under the watchful eye of a court-appointed monitor. Specifically, the preliminary injunction bans them from:
Making misleading earnings claims. Any claim about potential earnings must now be non-misleading, backed by reasonable evidence, and must have written materials available upon request. This aims to stop the "get rich quick" promises.
Misrepresenting key facts. They are now prohibited from lying about or misrepresenting things like the level of experience or the amount of capital required to succeed, as well as the terms of any refund or cancellation policies.
Using negative options without consent. The injunction prevents them from charging consumers for subscriptions or services without first getting their clear, express consent. This addresses a common tactic where a free trial automatically turns into a paid subscription without a customer's full awareness.
Violating the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule. This rule has specific requirements for telemarketers, including rules about when they can call, what they must disclose, and what they can't misrepresent. This part of the injunction ensures all telemarketing activity is honest and transparent.
This action sends a clear message that legal authorities are cracking down on alleged deceptive practices, especially those that target young and vulnerable consumers with promises of wealth that don't match reality.
Comments
Post a Comment