Skip to main content

The 14th vs. 15th Amendment: Untangling the Right to Vote for African Americans



The fight for voting rights in the United States is a long and complex one, marked by significant legal milestones and persistent challenges. A common point of confusion often arises when discussing the right to vote for African Americans: wasn't that guaranteed by the 14th Amendment? While the 14th Amendment was undeniably a landmark achievement in establishing equality, it was the 15th Amendment that explicitly and directly secured the right to vote for African American men. Let's break down why.

The Foundational Shift of the 14th Amendment
Ratified in 1868, in the wake of the Civil War, the 14th Amendment was transformative. Its primary goals were to establish citizenship for formerly enslaved people and to guarantee fundamental rights. Key provisions include:

Citizenship Clause: Declaring that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens. This directly addressed the status of formerly enslaved individuals.
Equal Protection Clause: Prohibiting states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause laid the groundwork for future civil rights advancements.
Due Process Clause: Ensuring that states cannot deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.
Importantly, while the 14th Amendment aimed at equality and had a provision to reduce a state's Congressional representation if it denied voting rights to male citizens, it did not explicitly grant all Black men the right to vote. It focused on establishing the principles of citizenship and equal protection, leaving the specific issue of suffrage somewhat open.

The Explicit Guarantee of the 15th Amendment
Recognizing the need for a clear and direct guarantee of voting rights regardless of race, the 15th Amendment was ratified in 1870. Its language is unambiguous:

"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."

This amendment directly addressed the issue of suffrage, prohibiting the denial or restriction of voting based on race. It was a monumental victory for the Reconstruction Era, explicitly aiming to enfranchise African American men across the nation.

The Rise of Voter Suppression
Despite the clear language of the 15th Amendment, many states, particularly in the South, quickly found ways to circumvent it. They couldn't deny the right to vote based on race, so they created barriers that disproportionately affected African Americans. These are some of the most common methods:

Poll Taxes: This was a fee that citizens had to pay in order to vote. While it applied to everyone, many African Americans and poor whites couldn't afford it, effectively barring them from the polls.

Literacy Tests: These tests required voters to demonstrate their ability to read and interpret complex legal documents or constitutional passages. The tests were often administered unfairly; Black voters were given more difficult passages and had their answers rejected, while white voters were passed without scrutiny or with much easier questions.

Grandfather Clauses: This was a clever and insidious way to maintain a nearly all-white electorate. It stated that you could vote only if your grandfather had been eligible to vote before the Civil War. This automatically excluded African Americans, whose grandfathers were enslaved and therefore ineligible to vote, while allowing white voters who might have otherwise been disqualified by poll taxes or literacy tests to bypass those requirements.

These discriminatory tactics, along with violence and intimidation, effectively disenfranchised the majority of African Americans for nearly a century, despite the protections of the 15th Amendment.

In Conclusion
While the 14th Amendment was a pivotal step in establishing citizenship and equal rights for African Americans, it was the 15th Amendment that explicitly enshrined their right to vote in the U.S. Constitution. Understanding this distinction, and the subsequent discriminatory tactics like poll taxes, literacy tests, and grandfather clauses, helps us appreciate the targeted nature of the struggle for suffrage and the long fight to ensure that the promise of equal access to the ballot box is fully realized for all citizens. The journey from the 15th Amendment to the Civil Rights Movement and the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 highlights the persistent need to protect and defend this fundamental right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...

Mortgage Fraud

Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced today the indictment of 13 individuals and a mortgage origination company for perpetrating over $100 million in mortgage fraud over a four-year period in the New York City metropolitan area. In addition, 12 individuals have already waived indictment and pleaded guilty to felonies relating to their participation in the mortgage fraud scheme. The indictment charges 13 individuals and the mortgage company, AFG FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., with enterprise corruption, grand larceny, scheme to defraud and conspiracy involving 19 fraudulent mortgage transactions. The defendants include the principals and a number of employees of the mortgage company, as well as bank employees, appraisers, and three attorneys. Two other attorneys are among the defendants who already pleaded guilty. The crimes charged in the indictment occurred between June 2004 and April 2009 with the bulk of the fraudulent closings occurring from mid-2005 through the end of...