We've all been there: faced with a rule that seems a bit silly or tedious, tempting us to take a shortcut. "What's the harm?" we might think. But a story from my past working at a New York City bank taught me a powerful lesson about the hidden importance of compliance.
I worked with a head teller named Sara (not her real name). She was a ray of sunshine—professional, kind, and excellent at her job. Then, one day, a storm rolled in. After she counted the cash in the bank’s ATMs, she came up $5,000 short.
Panic ensued. Even after recounts by supervisors, the money was still missing. The bank launched an investigation, and within a couple of days, Sara was let go. It was a shocking and swift termination for an employee everyone loved.
But the story took another turn. A day or two later, the $5,000 was found! It had simply been misplaced. Our branch manager, Pete, was overjoyed and immediately called Human Resources, certain they would rehire Sara.
To his dismay, HR said no.
It turned out the investigation had revealed that Sara, in an effort to be efficient, had been counting the ATM money by herself. Bank policy, however, required two people to be present for an ATM count—a procedure called dual control. Sara was fired not for the missing money, but for being out of compliance and violating a key bank policy.
It might seem unfair. The money was found, after all. But Sara’s story is a stark example of why rules, even seemingly small ones, are so critical.
Risk Prevention: The dual-control rule wasn't about distrust; it was about preventing exactly this kind of crisis. It's a system designed to catch errors before they become a massive headache, saving the bank time, money, and stress.
Accountability and Trust: Dual control creates a clear chain of accountability. When two people are present, any discrepancy is immediately noted and verified. When Sara counted alone, she created a situation where she could be wrongly blamed, and the bank couldn't be certain that the proper procedure was followed. For a bank, maintaining trust with both employees and customers is paramount.
Protection for Everyone: Most importantly, this rule was there to protect Sara, too. Having a second person present would have shielded her from suspicion and provided a witness to the count, likely preventing her termination in the first place.
Compliance isn't about bureaucracy; it’s about creating a safe, consistent, and accountable environment for everyone. Sara's story is a difficult but clear lesson: Sometimes, the greatest harm comes not from a mistake, but from the simple act of not following the rules put in place to prevent them.
If Sara followed the policy, Sara would still have her job!
ReplyDelete