Skip to main content

Shining a Light on Online Hate: Understanding New York's "Stop Hiding Hate" Act



The digital world offers incredible ways to connect, learn, and express ourselves. But unfortunately, it also provides a fertile ground for hate speech, misinformation, and harassment. To tackle this growing problem, New York State has enacted a new law called the "Stop Hiding Hate" Act.

Think of it as a push for greater transparency. This law requires major social media companies operating in New York (those making over $100 million annually) to report biannually to the Attorney General's office. These reports will detail:

Their definitions: How do they define harmful content like hate speech, racism, misinformation, extremism, harassment, and even foreign political interference in their terms of service?
Their enforcement: How do they actually apply these rules? What actions do they take when content violates their policies?
The numbers: How many posts were flagged as potential violations? How many actions did they take (like removing content, demonetizing it, or reducing its visibility)?
The first reports are due by January 1. The goal isn't to silence opinions, but to hold these powerful platforms accountable for how they manage harmful content. As Attorney General Letitia James stated, it’s about ensuring "these companies are more transparent about how they are addressing harmful content on their platforms."

Hate Speech vs. Free Speech: Where's the Line?
This is a crucial distinction, and one often misunderstood. The "Stop Hiding Hate" Act does not regulate a person's general political opinions, which are protected by the First Amendment. Instead, the focus is on content that crosses the line into actionable harm.

Free Speech (in the U.S.) means the government cannot generally restrict what you say. You are free to express unpopular opinions, criticize politicians, or advocate for political change, even if others disagree.
Hate Speech is typically defined as abusive or threatening language that expresses prejudice against a particular group, especially on the basis of identity (ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, etc.). While much of what is deemed offensive is still legally protected speech in the U.S., social media platforms can and do regulate it under their own private terms of service.
The New York law is targeted at transparency around the most dangerous content—including overt hate speech like slurs and threats, as well as covert harms like the systematic spread of disinformation and political extremism that fuel violence. The law seeks to expose if platform policies or algorithms are covertly amplifying or failing to moderate this harmful content.

The Real-World Consequences of Promulgating Hate Speech
While expressing an offensive opinion might be legally protected, the consequences of hate speech are very real and destructive:

Fuels Violence and Discrimination: As Assemblymember Grace Lee noted regarding the Asian American community, "online lies can fuel real-world violence." Hate speech dehumanizes groups, making it easier for individuals to justify discrimination, harassment, and even physical attacks. The law's sponsors noted this is crucial as "political violence and threats" emanate from online hate and disinformation.
Creates a Hostile Environment: When platforms are rife with hate, targeted individuals and communities—especially minorities—feel unsafe and silenced. Statistics show that hate is often identity-based, meaning certain groups are disproportionately targeted.
Erodes Trust and Divides Society: The constant spread of hateful rhetoric and misinformation deepens societal divisions, erodes trust in facts, and undermines civil discourse.
Consequences for Platforms: Social media companies that fail to post their clear policies or submit a materially incomplete or misleading report face a civil penalty of up to $15,000 per violation per day. The law provides a mechanism for accountability when companies fail to uphold their responsibility to their users.
The "Stop Hiding Hate" Act is a significant first step toward demanding accountability. It gives the public and the state a tool to see behind the curtain of opaque content moderation, ensuring that platforms are not just talk, but action, when it comes to stopping hate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

DISTRICT ATTORNEY VANCE ANNOUNCES INDICTMENT OF SIX SUBCONTRACTING COMPANIES AND THEIR OWNERS IN MULTIMILLION-DOLLAR FRAUD

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the indictments of six subcontracting companies and their owners for colluding with LEHR CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (LEHR) in a multimillion dollar scheme that defrauded numerous construction clients over the past decade. See, related story. The announcement comes one day after DA Vance announced LEHR and four executives were indicted on crimes including Enterprise Corruption, the New York State Racketeering law. GODSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and its owner ARTHUR GODSELL are charged with Grand Larceny in the Second Degree. JT ROSELLE LIGHTING, INC. and its owner JAMES ROSELLE, LIBERTY CONTRACTING CORPORATION and its owners GEORGE FOTIADIS and KEVIN FOTIADIS, PJ MECHANICAL and its owner JAMES PAPPAS, SUPERIOR ACOUSTICS, INC. and its owner KENNETH MCGUIGAN, and SWEENEY & HARKIN CARPENTRY and its owner MICHAEL HAYES are charged with Grand Larceny in the Third Degree.[1] "The defendants in this case cheated clie...

Mortgage Fraud

Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced today the indictment of 13 individuals and a mortgage origination company for perpetrating over $100 million in mortgage fraud over a four-year period in the New York City metropolitan area. In addition, 12 individuals have already waived indictment and pleaded guilty to felonies relating to their participation in the mortgage fraud scheme. The indictment charges 13 individuals and the mortgage company, AFG FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., with enterprise corruption, grand larceny, scheme to defraud and conspiracy involving 19 fraudulent mortgage transactions. The defendants include the principals and a number of employees of the mortgage company, as well as bank employees, appraisers, and three attorneys. Two other attorneys are among the defendants who already pleaded guilty. The crimes charged in the indictment occurred between June 2004 and April 2009 with the bulk of the fraudulent closings occurring from mid-2005 through the end of...