A recent federal case ended on Friday, November 7, 2025, with the sentencing of Zimnako Salah to six years in prison for a plot targeting Christian churches across multiple states. While the physical threat was a "hoax bomb," the conviction and serious sentence weren't just about the fake threat—they were about the intent and the target.
This case powerfully illustrates how the U.S. government uses federal law to protect religious freedom and prosecute crimes motivated by hate.
The Laws: What Federal Statutes Were Violated?
Salah was convicted of two primary federal crimes, with an extremely serious special finding:
1. The Hoax and False Information (18 U.S.C. § 1038)
It's a serious felony to convey false or misleading information that suggests a crime or catastrophe is taking place or is about to take place, especially one that could involve an explosive device.
The Crime: Salah was convicted of strapping a backpack around a toilet in a Christian church bathroom with the specific intent to convey a hoax bomb threat.
The Consequence: Hoax bomb threats are not considered harmless pranks. They cause panic, waste massive law enforcement resources, and can lead to injury as people flee. Federal law treats this as a serious offense with significant penalties.
2. Obstruction of Free Exercise of Religion (18 U.S.C. § 247)
This federal statute protects the right of all people to worship freely without intimidation or interference. The First Amendment guarantees religious freedom, and federal law protects that right from being violated through force or the threat of force.
The Crime: By placing the hoax bomb, Salah intended to obstruct the free exercise of religion of the church’s congregants. He sought to terrorize them and shut down their religious service simply because he disagreed with their faith.
The Key Enhancement: Why It Was a Hate Crime
The most significant factor in this case was a special finding by the jury that Salah targeted the church because of the religion of the people who worshipped there.
What is a Hate Crime? Federal hate crime laws, like the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, allow prosecutors to impose enhanced penalties when a crime is motivated by bias against a victim's actual or perceived characteristics, which includes religion.
The Evidence of Hate: Prosecutors presented evidence that Salah had consumed extremist propaganda online, including searching for videos of “Infidels dying” and watching ISIS murder videos. This demonstrated that his actions were premeditated and rooted in deep-seated religious animosity, confirming the hate crime motivation.
The Consequence: A Message to Terrorists and Haters
Zimnako Salah was sentenced on November 7, 2025, to six years in prison. This penalty was justified not only by the immediate crimes but also by the characteristics of the defendant, including:
Building a Real Bomb: The discovery of component parts for an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) in his storage unit showed his plot went beyond hoaxes and demonstrated his lethal intentions.
Targeting Multiple States: His plot was not a single incident; he targeted churches in Arizona, California, and Colorado.
Zero Tolerance: As authorities stated at sentencing, this outcome sends a clear message: “those who target people because of their faith will face the full force of federal law.” The government is committed to protecting the right of every American to worship and live free from fear, regardless of their religious beliefs.
Comments
Post a Comment