Skip to main content

The Uncomfortable Truth: George Washington's "Criminal" Record

History is written by the victors. In American history textbooks, George Washington is the ultimate hero—the stoic general who led a ragtag army to victory and the wise first president who stepped down from power. He is the "Father of His Country," carved into mountains and immortalized on currency.

But if we strip away the mythology and examine his actions through the lens of strict legality—both 18th-century law and modern definitions of political violence—a different picture emerges. It is the portrait of a man who, while achieving great political feats, was also a perpetrator of acts that fit the definitions of treason, terrorism, and war crimes.

To truly understand our history, we must be willing to look at the full ledger. Here is a breakdown of the "criminal" acts committed by George Washington.

1. The Terrorist: Leading a Conspiracy Against the Crown
Before he was a president, George Washington was a radical insurgent. By modern definitions, his role in the American Revolution fits the profile of a terrorist leader engaged in a violent conspiracy to overthrow a sovereign government.

The Conspiracy: Long before the first shot was fired, Washington met in secret with other colonial elites in the Continental Congress. Together, they drafted documents and plotted strategies to undermine the King’s authority. In the eyes of British law, this was sedition—a criminal conspiracy to destroy the government.
Insurgency and Terror Tactics: Washington led a non-state army fighting against established rule. His movement did not just fight on the battlefield; it utilized terror to enforce loyalty. "Patriots" under the umbrella of his leadership tarred and feathered loyalist civilians, burned their homes, and confiscated their property to fund the rebellion. These were acts of political violence designed to intimidate the population into submission.
High Treason: By taking up arms against King George III, Washington committed High Treason. This was not a metaphorical crime. Had the revolution failed, Washington would not have been a "Founding Father"; he would have been executed—likely hanged, drawn, and quartered—as a traitorous warlord who shattered the peace of the realm.
2. Crimes Against Humanity: The Enslaver
While slavery was legal in Washington's time, by modern universal standards of human rights, it is considered a crime against humanity. Washington was not a passive participant in this system; he was an active and wealthy enslaver for his entire adult life.

Human Chattel: At the time of his death, 317 enslaved human beings lived on his Mount Vernon estate. He personally owned 123 of them, controlling their bodies, labor, and lives for his own economic gain.
Systemic Violence: He managed a plantation system built on the threat and use of violence to force labor from unwilling people. He provided meager rations and housing while demanding grueling work.
The Pursuit of Runaways: Washington relentlessly pursued those who sought their freedom. He used his power to hunt down escapees like Oney Judge and Hercules Posey. He signed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 into law, federalizing the crime of seeking one's own liberty.
3. War Crimes: The "Town Destroyer"
Perhaps the most damning charge by modern standards relates to Washington's military conduct against Native Americans. During the Revolutionary War, he ordered a campaign that today would be classified as a war crime and an act of ethnic cleansing.

In 1779, Washington ordered General John Sullivan to launch a "scorched earth" expedition against the Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee). His written orders were explicit, brutal, and targeted civilians:

"The immediate objects are the total destruction and devastation of their settlements... It will be essential to ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more."

This was not a military strategy to defeat combatants; it was a deliberate strategy to create a famine. Sullivan's troops burned over 40 villages and destroyed 160,000 bushels of food, leaving thousands of Indigenous women, children, and elderly people to face starvation and exposure during a brutal winter.

The Seneca chiefs gave Washington the name Hanödaga:yas, which translates to "Town Destroyer." It was a title earned through a campaign of terror against a civilian population—an act that would see a modern general brought before the International Criminal Court.

Conclusion
Acknowledging these facts does not mean we must erase George Washington from history. But it does require us to abandon the one-dimensional fairytale of a flawless hero. He was a complex man of his time—a revolutionary leader capable of immense courage, yet simultaneously a conspirator who utilized terror tactics, a lifelong enslaver of human beings, and a commander who ordered the destruction of an entire people's way of life.

Honest history demands that we hold both the achievements and the atrocities in our minds at the same time. Only then can we truly understand the violent foundation upon which the United States was built.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

15 Gang Members Convicted on Conspiracy, Weapons Possession, Firearms Trafficking Charges Case Follows Recent Convictions of 137th Street Crew and East Harlem Narcotics Trafficking Organization

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., announced the results of the investigation and prosecution of one of Central Harlem’s most destructive criminal street gangs, referred to as “ONE TWENTY-NINE” or “GOODFELLAS/THE NEW DONS,” which terrorized the neighborhood surrounding West 129th Street between Lenox and Fifth Avenues. Thirteen members of the gang have previously pleaded guilty to importing, possessing, and using firearms over the course of the conspiracy.

The Myth, The Matrix, and The Malpractice: Unpacking the Sophia Stewart Saga

The internet loves a good underdog story, especially one where a lone creator battles Hollywood giants. Few tales have captivated online forums and social media quite like that of Sophia Stewart, the woman who famously sued the creators of The Matrix and The Terminator, claiming they stole her work, "The Third Eye." Her story is a complex tapestry woven with claims of stolen genius, judicial conflicts, and attorney negligence. Let's untangle the legal facts from the compelling narrative and examine the heart of her claims. The Core Allegation: "The Third Eye" and the Blockbusters Sophia Stewart alleged that her copyrighted manuscript, "The Third Eye," conceived in 1981 and finalized in 1983, was the blueprint for two of the most iconic sci-fi franchises: The Terminator (first film 1984) and The Matrix (first film 1999). From her perspective, the similarities were undeniable. Stewart’s supporters often point to broad, impactful themes and ev...

Charlie Kirk Was Right, and Charlie Kirk Was Wrong: The Enduring Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative commentator, has argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unnecessary, contending that the 14th Amendment should have been sufficient to guarantee equal rights. There's a compelling argument to be made for both sides of this statement. Let's break down where Kirk was right and, more importantly, where historical context reveals he was profoundly wrong. Where Charlie Kirk Was "Right" (In Theory) Kirk's theoretical point hinges on the idea that fundamental constitutional principles, if interpreted and enforced correctly, should have negated the need for additional legislation. And, in a perfect world, he would be correct. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, explicitly states that "no State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The intent was to ensure all citizens, particularly newly freed African Americans, were treated equally under the law. If this ...